Assessments · Integrity
Integrity without intimidation.
Results must be trustworthy — and candidates must be treated as professionals, not suspects. ELAREH's integrity model is tiered, disclosed in advance, and always human-reviewed.
What the candidate sees before any exam
Exactly what is live
Identity and integrity, capability by capability
Four different things get called identity or proctoring on this platform. Here is exactly what is live, for which flow, and reviewed by whom.
| Capability | Status | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Account identity | ||
| One-time account identity check | Live | Human-reviewed |
| Registration identity (exam registrations, for example IELTS) | ||
| Live selfie, verification video and document capture at registration | Live | Human-reviewed; never automated pass/fail |
| Exam-day identity recheck | ||
| Fresh live selfie and liveness check before admission to the exam room | Live | Human-reviewed |
| In-attempt integrity signals (high-stakes exam attempts) | ||
| Tab-switch, window-focus, fullscreen, network and copy/paste events | Live | Human-reviewed |
| Local, event-triggered camera-stream presence; never continuous upload or recording | Live | Human-reviewed |
| Automated face match or biometric liveness verdict | Not configured | — |
| Multiple-face computer-vision detection | Not configured / roadmap | — |
| Continuous candidate video recording or background-audio semantic analysis | Not used | — |
| Automatic cheating verdict from any signal | Not used — a person always decides | — |
| Human integrity review of flagged signals | Live | Trained reviewer; every decision logged |
Three tiers
Match the stakes, not the maximum
Question randomisation and timing analysis. No camera. Written-work similarity checking is Roadmap, not live yet.
Adds tab-switch monitoring today, with identity check and full-screen enforcement on the roadmap. The default for credentials.
Live supervision at examination centres or scheduled remote sessions — for IELTS-class stakes.
The review rule
Signals are evidence.
People decide.
A flag never fails a candidate. It opens a case for a trained reviewer, who sees exactly which signals were raised and can dismiss it in one click — with every decision logged. The illustration below shows the level of detail a reviewer works from today; it is not a recording or video.
- 14:21:08Switched away from the exam tab during Q7Signal
- 14:21:12Returned to the exam tab 4s laterContext
- —Reviewer note: OS notification stole focus. No action.Dismissed
Illustrative — not a real case.