Team assessment
Review team skills with evidence
Use relevant assessment results to discuss development priorities with your team. This page presents an illustrative matrix, not a live team-coverage dashboard or an automated development-plan workflow.
A check mark identifies an example recorded result. A dash means no result is shown, not a zero score or proof of missing ability. Names and scores are illustrative, not live employee data.
On smaller screens, scroll the table horizontally to see every skill.
| Example member | Kubernetes | Terraform | Go | Incident response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Weber | 90 | 85 | 87 | No result shown |
| Lucía Fernández | 85 | 78 | No result shown | No result shown |
| Fatima Al-Rashid | 82 | No result shown | No result shown | 74 |
| Daniel Müller | 88 | 81 | 72 | No result shown |
| Kenji Nakamura | No result shown | 70 | No result shown | No result shown |
Example reading: incident response has 1 recorded result. Discuss what evidence is still needed; this does not establish real team coverage or operational risk.
Candidates can accept or decline individual assessment invitations. They acknowledge the assessment rules before starting and complete the checks required by that assessment. Participation is not an automatic employee test.
Use recorded results alongside role requirements and the person’s context. Your team decides development priorities; this example does not create a development plan or automatically recommend transfers or hires.
Completing an assessment does not automatically issue a credential. Certification requires an eligible live programme and authorized issuance. Check actual programme, assessment and delivery availability before planning.
Participation and sharing
Explain the purpose and the limits
Discuss how results will be used before inviting someone. Candidate settings control public sharing of Talent Passport sections. Authorized employer application and assessment records have their own access rules; this is not a guarantee that every employer record has an identical candidate view.
Read how evidence is reviewed- An individual invitation can be accepted or declined; assessment rules must be acknowledged before starting.
- Public sharing is candidate-controlled by section. Employer access also depends on permissions and the application or assessment relationship.
- Issued credentials are linked to the candidate, not owned by an employer. Acceptance depends on the recipient, and validity or status may change. Account closure withdraws credentials not already revoked on behalf of the holder; existing issuer revocations remain revoked. It does not keep credentials active indefinitely.
Start with a clear evidence discussion
Read the employer tools overview and check what is available for your intended use. This link opens information, not a contact request or a booked team-assessment service.
Read the enterprise overview